I do not consider myself a liberal. But when I read about the torture techniques that the CIA has been using against terror suspects, I was outraged. After 9/11, according to the Associated Press, detainees were questioned while naked, chained, and hooded, and if they refused to submit they were deprived of food, slapped, slammed into fake walls, doused in water, forced into stress positions, and waterboarded. At night they were chained in a standing position, naked or wearing diapers. They almost put one prisoner, who had a fear of insects, into a confinement box filled with caterpillars. Nudity and sleep deprivation are forbidden by the U.S. Army Field Manual. However, that didn’t seem to stop anyone.
Memos describing this horrific treatment were just released by the Justice Department in response to a lawsuit filed by the ACLU, and Barack Obama decided to end the aforementioned torture methods. “We have taken steps to ensure that the actions described within them (the memos) never take place again,” he said. I can’t believe I’m saying this because I usually don’t agree with anything he does, but I agree with Obama’s decision.
Liberals, conservatives, and libertarians alike should be outraged that agents representing America, a nation known as the land of the free, tortured and took away the dignity of people who hadn’t been convicted of crimes. America should be the nation that stands up for freedom, but instead we took people’s freedom away, making us essentially no better than the terrorists we were trying to stop. Yes, this torture might have helped stop terrorist attacks and save lives, but even if it definitely did, that does not make it right. As a deontologist, I believe that it is never morally acceptable to violate people’s rights, regardless of the consequences. I hate when people try to justify something merely by saying “it saves lives.” Well, maybe it does, but if it violates an innocent person’s rights (which the terror suspects might not be, but we don’t know because they hadn’t been tried by a court of law) then it’s wrong no matter how many lives it saves.
Although I think Bush is okay overall (not the best, but okay), I really disagree with him and his supporters on this particular issue. “The use of these techniques does not inflict either physical or psychological damage,” David Rivkin, a constitutional lawyer, said to Fox News. Really? Being stripped naked, shoved into walls, smacked around, and being made to feel like you’re drowning to death doesn’t inflict psychological damage?
Then Rivkin went on to say that the release of the memos made the torture techniques “essentially unusable in the future.” And that’s bad why?
Dana Perino, Bush’s former press secretary, told the Washington Times that “We kept this country safe for 7 1/2 years and it’s time they gave us some credit for it.” Maybe, but the government’s purpose isn’t to keep America safe ; it’s to keep it free. The Patriot Act, excessive airport security, and now torture show that the Bush administration failed miserably in doing that. The government is supposed to serve the people. It needs to stop treating us like a parent treats a child, and start treating us like an employee treats a boss.
Unfortunately Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder do not intend to prosecute the perpetrators of these heinous acts, but the ACLU is saying that they should, and I agree. “There can be no more excuses for putting off criminal investigations of officials who authorized torture, lawyers who justified it and interrogators who broke the law,” said Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the ACLU.
I think that what happened was not only torture, but it was immoral, unconstitutional, and unjustifiable. It would be a travesty of justice if no one was punished for this. And I am not saying this as a libertarian, but simply as a patriotic American. There is no point in fighting terrorists if we are going to act just like terrorists ourselves.