It’s been a few days since California Chrome’s co-owner, Steve Coburn, angrily ranted on live TV about how horses who didn’t run in the Kentucky Derby shouldn’t be allowed to run in the Preakness or Belmont. Coburn has gotten blasted by many in the media for having poor sportsmanship, and after taking a couple days to think things over, he went on Good Morning America to give a heartfelt apology. So I’m not going to beat a dead horse by criticizing his attitude and how he chose to express his views. It’s understandable to be angry and looking for someone to blame after such a huge disappointment. But there’s been debate over whether Coburn’s views were right – should the rules of the Triple Crown be changed?
June 11, 2014
May 19, 2014
As all Bruins fans know, Milan Lucic has faced a lot of criticism after the Bruins’ game 7 loss to the Canadiens last week in the second round of the playoffs. During the handshake line after the game, Lucic allegedly told Canadien Dale Weise, “I’m going to *@!$ kill you next year.” Weise complained about Lucic in the media, saying, “Even in the handshake they had a couple of guys — or, sorry, just one — that couldn’t put it behind them and be a good loser. Milan Lucic had a few things to say to a couple guys… It’s just a poor way to lose… They just disrespected us in every single way and I don’t think they had any respect for us as a team. We’ll leave it at that. The better team won.”
Not surprisingly, Lucic has been called a sore loser. He’s been accused of disrespecting the sacred ritual of the handshake line. He’s even been called “pure, unadulterated human filth,” in a particularly nasty and mean-spirited piece.
Lucic stood by his actions and did not apologize, adding, “I didn’t make the NHL because I accepted losing or I accepted failure, and I think that’s what’s gotten me to this point and made me the player that I am.”
In my opinion, Lucic’s actions were understandable, and the criticism of him is going way overboard. His post-game reaction might not have been ideal, but there is nothing wrong with being upset and angry after you lose. Our society puts too much pressure on people to be happy, smiling, and gracious all the time, no matter the situation. But it is simply not logical for someone to be calm and happy after losing, especially a professional athlete whose team was eliminated in the second round of a postseason in which many people, including the team themselves, expected them to become the ultimate champions. As Lucic pointed out, accepting a loss means, to some extent, that you don’t care very much about your sport. The handshake line is a great tradition, with a great ideal behind it, and the Canadiens did win fair and square, which no one should take away from them. But is it really right to make people act gracious and happy when they would logically be feeling the exact opposite? We need to be more accepting of people who are justifiably angry and upset, and slower to label them “sore losers.”
One thing that we shouldn’t accept, however, is what I like to call “sore winners.” A sore winner is someone who wins, but continues to bash and criticize their opponent anyways. An example of this is when Montreal fans threw trash at Lucic and Zdeno Chara after the Canadiens’ 4-0 defeat of the Bruins in game 6 of the series. Another example, albeit to a lesser extent, is Weise’s criticism of Lucic and the Bruins in general. This type of behavior is really not understandable. It’s piling on, and kicking someone when they’re down. People who have just won should be happy – they got what they wanted and achieved their goal. They shouldn’t spend time and energy criticizing those whom they defeated. While “sore losers” get a lot of criticism in our society, it’s even more dishonorable to be a sore winner.
February 23, 2014
Although this blog is not primarily about sports, now that the 2014 Winter Olympics have come to an end, I think it’s fitting to pay tribute to my favorite athlete and one of my favorite people in the world: Russian figure skater Evgeni Plushenko. For him, the past few weeks have held both tragedy and triumph. After two excellent performances to help his country win the gold medal in the team figure skating event, he was forced to withdraw from the individual event due to injury mere seconds before he was scheduled to skate. But the way that Plushenko’s career ended does not change the fact that he is not only one of the greatest figure skaters in history, but also a remarkable and courageous person.
With two Olympic gold medals and two silvers, as well as three World Championship titles and countless other medals, Plushenko is arguably the most accomplished figure skater of all time. In addition to completing difficult jumps with remarkable ease and consistency (something that the error-filled skates of the newly-crowned Olympic gold and silver medalists threw into stark contrast), he has a sense of elegance, passion, and charisma that is uniquely his own. Plushenko began his career as an Olympic-level skater in 1998 at age 15, and won his first Olympic gold medal in 2006. As impressive as these accomplishments are, I admit that I didn’t really follow his career (or figure skating in general) until 2010, and it was his character and personality off the ice that initially made me a fan.
The night of the men’s free skate during the Vancouver Olympics, I was sitting on the couch, reading about something or other on my laptop, while glancing up at the TV occasionally. When American Evan Lysacek took to the ice, I was impressed that he didn’t make any mistakes, but I didn’t find his routine particularly memorable. A few skaters later, it was Plushenko’s turn. I’m no expert on figure skating, and was even less of one four years ago, but I thought his routine was more interesting to watch and showed more personality. Like Lysacek, he skated a clean program, but unlike Lysacek, he did a quad jump, making his routine more difficult. When his scores came up, and he was put in second place, I was vaguely disappointed but, not being extremely info figure skating, I went back to whatever I was doing on the computer. A few minutes later, Andrea Joyce of NBC interviewed Plushenko. I was expecting him to say what most athletes say in similar situations: that he was happy for Lysacek, that he was content to receive any medal at all, that he was just proud to have done his best.
November 3, 2013
As everyone knows, the Red Sox are World Series champions, and that means it’s time for a little break from crimes, trials, and politics. Above is a video that I made of the Sox’ rolling rally victory celebration. This was the 8th such parade in 12 years, following parades for the Patriots (2001, 2003, 2004), Red Sox (2004, 2007), Celtics (2008), and Bruins (2011). Approximately 1 million people filled the streets of Boston to salute their team on Saturday. I managed to find a relatively non-crowded section of the route near Mass. General Hospital from which to watch and photograph. Below are some photos that I took. Enjoy!
September 7, 2012
What happens to all the security cameras that are installed in host cities for the Olympics? According to a must-read blog post by Bob Sullivan at the Red Tape Chronicles, the answer is that for the most part, they stay there. This was posted a month ago, but I just saw it today:
“Host cities tolerate massive shows of security that would otherwise be unimaginable. In London, which already has more CCTV security cameras than any other city in the world, 2,000 new cameras were installed in the Olympic Village, while nearly 2,000 more were installed around the city, according to Big Brother Watch. License plate recognition systems have been installed throughout London. There are even surface-to-air missiles atop apartment buildings and more military troops on the ground than Britain has in Afghanistan. An $877 million effort, it’s been called the largest peacetime deployment of security forces in history, but the question remains: Will there be mission creep? How much of that infrastructure and the public’s newfound tolerance for being watched will remain after the Games are finished?”
The article paints a disturbing picture of the numerous ways in which everyone’s privacy is gradually shrinking, and how governments use the Olympics as just another excuse to accelerate this trend.
April 21, 2012
Let’s take a break from law and politics this morning to wish a very happy (belated) 100th birthday to the home of the Red Sox, Fenway Park. Watch part of the ceremony, featuring Red Sox legends from past and present, above.
January 22, 2012
Former Penn State football coach Joe Paterno passed away today of lung cancer, just two months after his reputation was irreparably tarnished by his alleged failure to respond forcefully enough to allegations of child abuse. It is, first of all, very sad that such a successful and celebrated coach had to spend the last months of his life not only fighting a painful disease but also knowing that his standing would be forever diminished in the eyes of many people. Second of all, Paterno is another example of our society’s tendency to punish people who are merely accused of wrongdoing, not found guilty. As Judge H. Lee Sarokin pointed out, Paterno was fired before the facts of the case could be determined, similarly to how Dominique Strauss-Kahn was pressured into resigning from the IMF after being accused of sexual assault, and how Herman Cain ended up quitting his presidential campaign after allegations of sexual harassment and an affair. Although Paterno faced no charges and spent no time in jail, for his career to end so abruptly and on such a bad note is undoubtedly a punishment. Yes, sexual abuse is a crime that should be punished severely, but considering the fact that Paterno is not accused of abusing anyone, that he actually reported the abuse allegations to his immediate supervisor, and that his only arguable mistake was not reporting the allegations personally to police, I think it is sad that his career and life ended the way that they did.